“In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely
than the expert to make important contributions.”
The issue claims that in
any field of inquiry, a beginner is more likely to make important contribution
then an expert. However generalization of such a statement cannot be done.
There is no acceptable basis that takes hold of the statement. Considering the probability of the reverse, Experts making more contribution then a beginner, is more likely. As an expert is experienced and has seen many problems being untangled. However, there is no such statistics that can predict the contribution on the basis of person being a beginner or expert.
There is no acceptable basis that takes hold of the statement. Considering the probability of the reverse, Experts making more contribution then a beginner, is more likely. As an expert is experienced and has seen many problems being untangled. However, there is no such statistics that can predict the contribution on the basis of person being a beginner or expert.
The field of inquiry or
research in any endeavor requires a person to have full theoretical and
practical knowledge of the concept which, comes with experience. Experience in
turn has no substitute. It can only be acclaimed with constant work in the
concern field for considerable time. With the passage of time and dealing with
the problems related in that field one gain an insight and unravel or untangle
what so ever paradox is in hand.
Let us take two
contrasting example: Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg. Steve Jobs who worked for years to take apple
to the present acme was an expert at his field on the other hand Mark is a
beginner and attained success in short span. The presented example forfeits any
generalization on contribution on the basis of expertize or beginner. However,
what they both had in common was a willing and enthusiastic approach towards
their endeavors.
As one grows his/her
incite, his /her interest and knowledge in the more minute details of the field
is increased and this in turn leads to more innovations. Thomas Edison has made
a great deal of contribution in many zones of innovation .With the expertise
and experience Thomas Edison having high patent on his name. Hence, to
contribute in research field a consistent work and persistence is required
along with a great deal of enthusiasm.
Thus to conclude; the
statement that "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than
the expert to make important contributions." is irrational. Research or
inquiry work needs a persistent attitude and enthusiastic approach to
contribute. . As Einstein said "imagination is more important than
knowledge". Likewise, who so ever possess the right attitude will be more
likely to make a grand contribution.
No comments:
Post a Comment